← Atlas of Organizational Intelligence

Encyclopedia directory

Forced Labor

Search the complete atlas or narrow it by entry type, topic, and evidence state.

Clear

Filtered view

3 entries

Forced Labor

InstitutionClaim Cited

Kafala sponsorship systems

Kafala names a family of labor-migration arrangements, not one regional code. Their common institutional move is to connect a migrant worker's legal presence or labor mobility to a private sponsor, usually the employer. That delegation can make an employment dispute carry immigration consequences. Evidence from Lebanon shows how recruitment costs, status dependency, domestic-work exclusions, passport retention, and isolation can reinforce one another; Qatar shows that formal mobility reform can produce large numbers of job-change applications while employer resistance, uneven enforcement, and weak worker voice persist.

What happens when a state delegates control over a migrant worker's legal presence to the employer whose conduct the worker may need to escape?

InstitutionClaim Cited

Zeiss

Zeiss links scientific optics, specialist production, employee commitments, and science funding through foundation ownership. Its changing history also exposes ownership's limits: the statute was altered under National Socialism, Zeiss made military instruments and used forced labor, the Jena operations were expropriated, and later reunification required institutional reconstruction.

Can ownership be designed to preserve a scientific-industrial community across generations, and what prevents durable purpose from becoming durable self-preservation or accommodation to destructive power?

Organizational CaseClaim Cited

Democratic Kampuchea

From April 1975 to January 1979, the Communist Party of Kampuchea used forced transfers, cooperatives and worksites, controlled food, political classification, forced marriage, security centres, torture, execution, and genocidal policy to make survival conditional on a secretive party-state. A demographic reconstruction estimates a median 1.9 million excess deaths—21 percent of the population at risk—with a wide 95 percent simulation interval of 1.2–2.8 million; survivor memory and adjudicated crimes show losses that no organizational account can reduce to a single total.

What happens when an organization treats every independent relationship, institution, and source of knowledge as an obstacle to total political transformation?