Work design, productivity, and automation
NUMMI reopened General Motors' troubled Fremont plant in 1984 with a workforce drawn largely from the people the old system had blamed, then achieved much higher productivity and quality under a different Toyota–GM–UAW work arrangement. The reversal shows that productivity belongs to a system of training, standards, flow, support, voice, and authority—not to a worker's character. It also preserves a dispute: participation and stop-the-line power can improve work while standardization, rotation, and lean staffing can intensify it.
When substantially the same people produce different results under a different system, what changed in method, authority, and burden?